Home Embassy Information Sino-Indonesian relations Consular & Visa Services Culture, Education & Science Technology Economic & Trade Information Press Release and Media Coverage Features
 
Embassy Information
Resume of the Ambassador
Message from the Ambassador
Ambassador's Speeches
Contact the Embassy
Sino-Indonesian relations
Overall Relations
Visits& Exchanges
Documents
Consular & Visa Services
Chinese Visa Application Form
Important Notice
Service Directory
Chinese Visa Information
Notarizations & Legalizations
Chinese Visa Application Service Center
Press Release and Media Coverage
Press Release
From Indonesian Media
Culture, Education & Science Technology
Chinese Culture
Educational Cooperation
Science and Technology
Economic & Trade Information
Website of Economic and Commercial Counselor's Office
China-Indonesia Economic and Trade Cooperation Forum
Useful Links
Chinese Consulate General in Surabaya
Chinese Consulate General in Medan
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of PRC
Chinese Central Government
Belt and Road Portal
ASEAN-China Center
China-ASEAN Expo
Boao Forum for Asia
China Central Television
People's Daily Online
China Radio International
China Daily
Xinhua News Agency
China Economic Net
  China Today
China Daily:Hiked tariffs won't hamper China's growth
 (2019-05-21)

After the 11th round of Sino-US trade talks, the representatives of the two sides said they were willing to continue consultations. But now that the United States administration has raised the tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods from 10 percent to 25 percent, the question to ask is: What impact could Washington's move have on the US and Chinese economies?

It is widely believed that additional tariffs imposed by the US on Chinese goods have so far added up to $2 billion to the US coffers. But the 10 percent tariff increase from the previous round seems to have been paid by US companies and consumers. Besides, US importers' profits will shrink if they do not pass the costs of higher tariffs on to US companies downstream and consecutively to the US consumers. So the ultimate burden of the tariffs will be borne by US consumers.

US consumers bear burden of higher tariffs

A study by a group of economists from Princeton University, Columbia University and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York estimates that US companies have suffered a loss of $1.4 billion due to the higher tariffs on Chinese goods, and American consumers have paid more than $3 billion for the increased tariffs.

According to another study by a group of economists from the World Bank and International Finance Corporation, the US-China trade dispute has cost the US economy $6.4 billion, equivalent to 0.03 percent of its GDP. And it seems unwise to force US companies and consumers to suffer such a huge loss for a small increase in fiscal revenue.

Some US strategists believe the US administration's efforts to intensify the trade dispute is aimed at forcing foreign companies to leave China, and thus "decouple" the US and other economies from the Chinese economy. They believe China became the "world's factory" and developed at an unprecedented pace thanks to the massive investments made by foreign companies.

An apt example of negative thinking

If the chain of foreign companies producing goods in China for US and European markets is broken, many of these companies will have no choice but to move out of China. And if China loses its position in the global value chain, it won't be able to maintain a healthy economic growth rate. To minimize China's capacity for development, the US strategists argue, the US and its companies should be prepared to swallow some bitter pills. And to achieve their long-term goals, the US companies should not hesitate to lose a little profit in the short term.

Although there is certain logic to such ideas, they lack precision and nuance. For example, the US strategists' argument does not take into account the fact that Sino-US trade, to a large extent, is composed of semi-finished products. For instance, Chinese companies import semiconductor components such as chips from the US, use them to make mobile phones, computers, and even large-scale mechanical equipment and then sell them in the domestic market or export them to other countries.

The reverse is also true. Some US companies import components from China and assemble them into industrial products. So if the US raises tariffs on Chinese products, China is bound to take retaliatory measures. Also, Chinese companies are likely to reduce the import of commonly used semiconductor components from the US, while US companies could reduce imports of parts from China. This trend will force Chinese companies to allocate more funds for research and development, and increase production to replace US imports. And given that China's industrial production consists of a complete supply chain, increasing investment would be beneficial to the Chinese economy.

This is not good news for US companies, especially because the US' industrial chain is "incomplete", meaning American companies have to import semi-finished products from other countries in order to produce finished goods. Since few countries can replace China as an exporter of inexpensive yet quality products to the US and the fact that their products will invariably cost more, US companies' overall costs will rise rapidly.

The US administration has directed American companies to not supply semiconductor components to Chinese enterprises. But since China is the largest semiconductor market, the news led to a sharp drop in share prices of US semiconductor companies. If US technology companies cannot export to China, they will soon yield place to competitors and lose access to a huge market.

US exports to China have been falling since last year, while Chinese exports to the US have reached historical levels. This shows US companies cannot easily find replacements for Chinese products. On the other hand, China can easily find substitutes for natural gas, oil and soybeans that it imports from the US. Which means the US' efforts to intensify the trade dispute with China would be counterproductive.

US can't stop Chinese economy from growing

If US companies' exports fall, they will be forced to lower their production levels, which could affect the US' economic growth. Conversely, if Chinese companies do not have access to advanced technologies, they will increase their R&D investment and expand their production capacities to make up for the lack of US imports. Which means the Chinese economy will continue to grow.

According to the international trade theory, importing countries are the biggest beneficiaries of international trade. But the US administration does not believe in that theory. Instead, it thinks China has been taking advantage of bilateral trade, and that's why it has a trade surplus with the US. The US believes its notions about trade are more reliable than the long-established laws of economics.

In fact, the US economy has maintained low inflation and stable economic growth rates by importing cheap goods from China. If the trade war interrupts this balance, and the US economy is really "decoupled" from the Chinese economy, it will no longer enjoy low inflation and high growth.

Higher tariffs shows US policies misplaced

China's exports to the US account for only 18 percent of its total exports. In 2018, China's total exports added up to $2.48 trillion. So by imposing a 25 percent tariff on $200 billion of Chinese products, the US will excessively tax less than 10 percent of China's exports. Besides, the proportion of exports in China's total economic output is only 20 percent. So a reduction in Chinese exports will not have any serious impact on the Chinese economy.

US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer was a key player in the US-Japan trade war in the 1980s. As such, he may use the same techniques to deal with China that he once employed to browbeat Japan.

But China today is different from what Japan was in the 1980s. The structure of China's exports to the US is completely different from that of Japan's, and the reasons for the respective trade surpluses are different as well. If the US applies the same logic that it used to settle the US-Japan trade conflict to address the Sino-US trade dispute, it will only end up hurting its own economy, as most of China's exports to the US are intermediate products, which are different from the finished products that Japan exported to the US.

Besides, the US should know that without the cheap goods imported from China, downstream US companies will suffer enormously, which incidentally will hurt the US economy.

 ·  China Daily:Hiked tariffs won't hamper China's growth  (2019-05-21)
 ·  Diplomatic envoys from 12 countries visit Xinjiang  (2019-01-14)
 ·  Interview with Xinjiang government chief on counterterrorism, vocational education and training  (2018-10-19)
 ·  Transcript of Vice Foreign Minister Le Yucheng's Exclusive Interview with the Financial Times  (2018-09-27)
 ·  China releases white paper on facts and its position on trade friction with U.S.  (2018-09-26)
 ·  Full Text: The Facts and China's Position on China-US Trade Friction  (2018-09-26)
 ·  China's 2017 growth shows "high gold content:" NDRC  (2018-01-22)
 ·  China's resident income rises 7.3 pct in 2017  (2018-01-18)
 ·  China Focus: China's economy expands 6.9 pct in 2017, beats forecasts  (2018-01-18)
 ·  "The Belt and Road" Digital Economy Int'l Co-op Initiative launched in Wuzhen  (2017-12-03)
 ·  Fourth World Internet Conference opens in Wuzhen  (2017-12-03)
 ·  Highlights of Xi's report to 19th CPC National Congress  (2017-10-20)
 ·  CPC opens 19th National Congress, declaring "new era" of China's socialism  (2017-10-20)
 ·  CPC expected to convene 19th National Congress on Oct. 18  (2017-09-01)
 ·  Wild giant panda spotted in SW China  (2017-09-01)
 ·  China's economy continues to enjoy strong growth  (2017-09-01)
 ·  Meng Jianzhu meets Indonesian Coordinating Minister for Maritime Affairs in Beijing  (2017-06-17)
 ·  Zhang Gaoli meets Indonesian Coordinating Minister for Maritime Affairs in Beijing  (2017-06-17)
 ·  The 14th Senior Officials' Meeting on the implementation of the DOC successfully held  (2017-05-19)
 ·  Transcript of Premier Li Keqiang's Meeting with the Press at the Fifth Session of the 12th National People's Congress  (2017-03-17)
 ·  Full Text: Report on the Work of the Government  (2017-03-16)
 ·  China promises further cuts to steel, coal capacity  (2017-03-06)
 ·  Graphics: China's major areas of work for 2017  (2017-03-06)
 ·  Graphics: Key projected targets for development in 2017 written in gov't work report  (2017-03-06)
 ·  Graphics: China's main work in 2016  (2017-03-06)
 ·  China's top legislature starts annual session  (2017-03-06)
 ·  China's top political advisory body starts annual session  (2017-03-05)
 ·  Full text: China's Policies on Asia-Pacific Security Cooperation  (2017-01-12)
 ·  China to phase out commercial ivory trade  (2017-01-02)
 ·  China to improve farmers' income, agricultural product quality  (2016-12-20)
 ·  China pledges stability, reform in 2017 as key economic meeting ends  (2016-12-16)
 ·  China adopts interpretation of Basic Law of Hong Kong SAR  (2016-11-07)
 ·  Sixth plenum of the 18th Central Committee held in Beijing  (2016-10-28)
 ·  China Releases National Plan on Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development  (2016-10-24)
 ·  Premier Li talks with WEF chief and business leaders at Davos forum  (2016-07-04)
 ·  Full text of Premier's speech at the opening ceremony of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the New Champions  (2016-07-01)
 ·  South China Sea: How We Got to This Stage  (2016-05-23)
 ·  Briefing by Director-General of the Department of Treaty and Law on the SCS Arbitration Initiated by the Philippines  (2016-05-17)
 ·  Director-General of the Department of Boundary and Ocean Affairs of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Ouyang Yujing Gives Interview to Chinese and Foreign Media on South China Sea Issue  (2016-05-08)
 ·  China's Economy Had a Good Start In the First Quarter of 2016  (2016-04-19)
 ·  Full Text: Report on the Work of the Government  (2016-03-17)
 ·  China's economy won't suffer hard landing: Premier Li  (2016-03-16)
 ·  Xinhua Insight: Legislature to provide institutional guarantee for China's 2020 goals  (2016-03-10)
 ·  Foreign Minister Wang Yi Meets the Press  (2016-03-08)
 ·  Hard landing fallacy "no way" in China: regulator  (2016-03-06)
 ·  Key figures in China's government work report  (2016-03-06)
 ·  Premier Li delivers gov't work report at 4th session of 12th NPC  (2016-03-05)
 ·  People's Daily: China is observing international law in the true sense  (2015-12-23)
 ·  People's Daily: Disregarding facts and jurisprudence, arbitration is neither fair nor just  (2015-12-23)
 ·  People's Daily: The DOC brooks no distortion  (2015-12-23)
Features
Conference on Dialogue of Asian Civilizations
Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation
China Celebrates 40th Anniversary of Reform and Opening Up
China International Import Expo
More...
From Indonesian Media
Terowongan Kereta Cepat di Walini Tersambung
Kompas Daily: China continues to innovate
The Jakarta Post: Lessons learned from China's ballet production
The Jakarta Post: 'The Red Lantern' raised up 'en pointe'
BKPM: Jokowi's SeaToll Road,China's One Belt One Road are Similar